Motivated Action Theory: a Formal Theory of Causal Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Lynn Andrea Stein
  • Leora Morgenstern
چکیده

When we reason about change over time, causation provides an implicit preference: we prefer sequences of situations in which one situation leads causally to the next, rather than sequences in which one situation follows another at random and without causal connections. In this paper, we explore the problem of temporal reasoning—reasoning about change over time—and the crucial role that causation plays in our intuitions. We examine previous approaches to temporal reasoning, and their shortcomings, in light of this analysis. We propose a new system for causal reasoning, motivated action theory, which builds upon causation as a crucial preference criterion. Motivated action theory solves the traditional problems of both forward and backward reasoning, and additionally provides a basis for a new theory of explanation. Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991 This report describes research done at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Support for the work described in this paper was provided in part by Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Support for the laboratory's artificial intelligence research is provided in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense under Office of Naval Research contract N00014-85-K-0124. artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY. Appro*«!, fat pdAy mtem® JXetrfbofloft Oafaftid 19950125 148 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 ?s,-;..: reoor; v. our den tor :•■■•■> .:oi:i".tion .-■ ntorrr j:.on is fsiimaii'a :z -we" jJU'i.-nng jna maintaining the 'Jjui neeae-j md .:c~:..:etinq and re. ...s.n:; in ■ cüeaton ot ntormauon, including suggest urn lor r-jucing mis auj<-n SO ■' Oa-isllighwd/ Suite 1204. Arlington. /•". .v;02-43CV and to :'ie ()•' ■ •• 3' M . ■or o?sporse n.-luding the tune lor IPVIOWT'J instructions, sear.naiq evslinq ualc St in1.rrn.Hiun Si'n.j"o:>"svnents regarding mis burden estimate O' in ,. <. tni'r aspt leddquariers '»! i DILI'S. Lio-ctordie tor in tor motion Opera Hens .mil Kop^rts ! .■ I 'i nd lludjet 1' iperwor* Reduction Crofevt I0/C4-018Ö), Washingtn. i-j C .0M:3 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave ölank) 2. REPORT DATE December 1991 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED memorandum 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Motivated Action Theory: A Formal Theory of Causal Reasoning

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A weighted causal theory for acquiring and utilizing open knowledge

Motivated by enabling intelligent robots/agents to make use of open-source knowledge resources to solve open-ended tasks, a weighted causal theory is introduced as the formal basis for the development of these robots/agents. The action model of a robot/agent is specified as a causal theory following McCain and Turner’s nonmonotonic causal theories. New knowledge is needed when the robot/agent i...

متن کامل

Why Things Go Wrong: A Formal Theory of Causal Reasoning

This paper presents a theory of generalized temporal reasoning. We focus on the related problems of 1. Temporal Projection-determining all the facts true in a chronicle, given a partial description of that chronicle, and 2. Explanation-figuring out what went wrong if an unexpected outcome occurs. We present a non-monotonic temporal logic based on the notion that actions only happen if they are ...

متن کامل

Causal Theories: A Categorical Perspective on Bayesian Networks

In this dissertation we develop a new formal graphical framework for causal reasoning. Starting with a review of monoidal categories and their associated graphical languages, we then revisit probability theory from a categorical perspective and introduce Bayesian networks, an existing structure for describing causal relationships. Motivated by these, we propose a new algebraic structure, which ...

متن کامل

“Survey” of Formal Epistemology: Some Propaganda, and an Example

What is “Formal Epistemology”? Not sure, really. I first heard the term from Sahotra Sarkar in 2003 . It seems that it is quite a broad field, which includes: Ampliative inference (including inductive logic); Game theory and decision theory; Formal learning theory; Formal theories of coherence: Foundations of probability and statistics; Formal approaches to paradoxes of belief and/or act...

متن کامل

Reasoning About Actions: Steady Versus Stabilizing State Constraints

In formal approaches to commonsense reasoning about actions, the Ramification Problem denotes the problem of handling indirect effects which implicitly derive from so-called state constraints. We pursue a new distinction between two kinds of state constraints which will be proved crucially important for solving the general Ramification Problem. Steady constraints never, not even for an instant,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Artif. Intell.

دوره 71  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1994